Yuantong leaked 400,000 pieces of personal information privacy protection. The new law wants to erect a regulatory barrier.

The “era of big data” obviously should not be an “era of infringement”. Recently, Yuantong leaked 400,000 pieces of personal privacy information, and the topic surrounding the security of personal information has once again become a hot topic of public opinion. The reporter learned yesterday that the laws and norms to strengthen the fight against personal privacy leakage have shown “sharp teeth”, and the basic norms for App to collect personal information will be introduced at the end of the year at the earliest, and the minimum necessary information that can be collected will be defined; “People’s Republic of China (PRC) Personal Information Protection Law (Draft)” can punish serious illegal acts as high as 50 million yuan, and personal privacy protection is about to usher in a new stage.understand 黑客網站 In order to better serve customers and reflect the core competitiveness of products. https://www.lvbug.com/

Yuantong leaked 400,000 personal information.

400,000 pieces of express information leaked and caused a storm.

Recently, the news that 400,000 pieces of personal information were leaked by ghosts in Yuantong spread. YTO Express responded by saying that the investigation found that there were abnormal inquiries about the waybill information in two accounts of affiliated outlets in Hebei province, and it was suspected that some employees of affiliated outlets colluded with external criminals and used employee accounts and illegal tools of third parties to steal waybill information, which led to information leakage, and the relevant suspects were arrested in September.

However, many netizens said that they did not “buy it”: it was obviously the bad consequence caused by poor internal supervision of the enterprise. Why did Yuantong’s response give people a sense of self-praise that “it was discovered in time, reported the case in time and cooperated with the investigation and handling in the whole process”? After the completion of the incident handling, did Yuantong carry out targeted rectification and security optimization of related information systems? For a time, Yuantong’s “perfunctory” apology even brewed a bigger storm than leaking 400,000 pieces of user information. As of press time at 23: 00 yesterday, Yuantong has not yet responded to this.

According to Xu Yong, vice president of the Express Branch of China Communications and Transportation Association, citizen information disclosure is not only a unique phenomenon in the express delivery industry, but a risk faced by all walks of life in the era of big data. Personal information leaks frequently. Is there any way?

Self-discipline “blacklist” has been sharpened

“As far as the scale of China’s express delivery business is concerned, the crime rate of China’s express delivery industry is at a low level internationally.” According to Xu Yong, in recent years, the “blacklist” system of the integrity alliance spontaneously established by the express delivery industry has played a certain role in industry self-regulation.

The reporter learned that since 2016, 70 large express logistics enterprises in China have jointly set up a “blacklist” inquiry system for express logistics, blacklisting 12 kinds of illegal acts such as stealing express mail, revealing customer information and reselling customer information. Enterprises participating in the “blacklist” system of express logistics enterprises promise not to use the courier on the “blacklist” within 5 years.

According to the data released by the National Bureau of Statistics recently, there are more than 3 million employees in the domestic express delivery industry, and the employees covered by enterprises participating in the above system have reached more than 2 million. According to Xu Yong, since the establishment of the system five years ago, a total of 27 thousand express delivery practitioners have been blacklisted; In the past two years, the illegal activities of express logistics enterprises have dropped by over 95%.

But industry self-discipline alone is not enough. “In addition to relying on the standardized management of enterprises and platforms, the most important thing for industry norms is to increase the illegal cost and sanction criminals by legal means. It is necessary not only to increase penalties for employees who disclose citizen information, but also to severely crack down on the entire industrial chain that participates in and implements illegal information transactions. ” In Xu Yong’s view, the improvement of corresponding laws and regulations is the most fundamental weapon to solve the problem of information leakage.

Legal norms are on the way.

In fact, the disclosure of public privacy has been widely found in many fields, such as express delivery, online shopping, real estate, job hunting, etc. Consumers have encountered the risk of “streaking” information in almost all fields. “The important prerequisite for technology to facilitate people’s lives is security. Only stricter laws and regulations and law enforcement can become a sharp edge to protect the security of personal information.” Lawyer Zhu Jinyuan, director of Beijing Guandao Law Firm, said.

Fortunately, the management of personal privacy leakage that makes people scratch their heads is about to usher in a turning point. The reporter learned that the Basic Specification for Personal Information Collection by Mobile Internet Application (App) of Information Security Technology (draft for approval) compiled by the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee has been in the stage of submission for review.

“This specification is expected to be officially promulgated at the end of this year or early next year. It will clearly define the apps in major areas such as house rental and sales, transportation ticketing, job hunting, online shopping, express logistics, catering and take-away online communities, instant messaging, etc., and refine what the minimum necessary information can be collected.” A staff member of China’s App special governance working group told the reporter that this will further standardize the behavior of various apps to collect information.

In addition, the “People’s Republic of China (PRC) Personal Information Protection Law (Draft)” is currently seeking opinions, and it is proposed to substantially increase the personal illegal cost. The draft proposes that an enterprise may be fined less than 50 million yuan or less than 5% of the turnover in the previous year if it commits relevant illegal acts, and at the same time, the person directly responsible shall be fined more than 100,000 yuan and less than 1 million yuan.